By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
KiigelHeart said:
DonFerrari said:

Nope. I don't play MP and couldn't care less if there is or not. But you were the one basically demanding that all games have it because you need MP shooting festa. And then showed you don't care about it costing, taking time and etc just to please your taste.

"Keep your MPs out of my games" that's a quote from your earlier post. You say you don't care if there is multiplayer or not so why are you even arguing with those who want to have that option?

And then you come up with that bullshit based on what, me saying multiplayer isn't necessary but adds value and that diverting time off devs was a good point? Yeah keep it up...

Yes and I stand on the keep your MPs out of my games. The dev didn't found a need to put MP but you are demanding it because you want MP in all games. I'm not going to CoD or Halo and requesting they to be SP only because that is not the focus. So I have no problem saying that a SP focused game don't get pestered with MP.

I keep arguing because those take time and resources that would be better invested on the focus of the game.

And no it doesn't add value, it adds feature. It would add value if it would sell more and make the devs more profit, so unless you can prove the game will generate more money due to MP (and more than it costed of course) them you can't affirm it. And the MP mania have destroyed a lot of IPs.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."