routsounmanman said:
They are more fincancially stable than Sony, precicely because they're being cautious. And do you know what happened during the (early) PS3 days to Sony? Huge amounts of losses for an extended amount of time. If that were to happen to Nintendo, lights out. |
From what I know PS3 lost about 6B on the first 3 years and I also heard that Nintendo had more than this as cash. So we don't need to excuse Nintendo on being the one that gambles the less, they may make the more different HW, but they are the ones that puts less weight and finnancial commitment out of the 3. MS alone put 3B only to buy mohjang.
duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."