By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
AngryLittleAlchemist said:
LuckyTrouble said:

Nah, Naughty Dog is good at committing to what they feel is the end of a story. Look at Crash and Jak. They made the games they wanted to and haven't gone back. Sure, the IP rights were sold and other more mediocre titles got made (Jak was given mercy with only one subpar non-Naughty Dog title), but in the case of Crash, Sony seems to be on the edge of reclaiming the IP and Jak seems to firmly remain in Sony's hands at this juncture with no further abuse of the IP. After all that, I don't see Uncharted being sold off to create lesser games that will only sully the legacy of the series.

How can you even say this? Naughty Dog used to be a studio consistently making new stuff but what they have now is more or less a progression of what theyve done since 2007. Originlly there was supposed to be no Last of Us 2, then they said the chances were 50/50 because they were thinking of making a new IP, then they just made TLOU2. Uncharted 4 I was like "ehhhhh id really like to see something new, but I can understand trying to get the PS4 library off the ground with a sequel". It ended up being a great game. But now we need another one? I really hope we domt get a Last of Us 3. 

 

I understand how my previous comment seems like flamebait, but it isnt. It isnt constructive  criticism either. It's an opinion. I just feel the well is running dry. But alas, I know it will just come off as "edgy contrarianism" . I actually am excited for TLOU2 and to a small extent Lost Legacy. I just think its such a narrow view of what Naughty Dog can do. 

Yes it is totally your opinion. Both Sony and ND have been very direct multiple times saying that ND develops what they want, so if they made the games was because they wanted to tell the story. That was why they decided to put TLOU at the end of the gen and take a lot of risk. If they also decided UC deserved or needed a last shoot good for them. I like the game.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."