By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
routsounmanman said:
BraLoD said:

My magical dream world? And where the fuck I said something like that? Don't make assumptions, specially being that rude.

He wants Nintendo to not get downgraded ports compared to consoles, then ask for Nintendo to do similar hardware to those, that's about it.

I was rude? It's not an assumption. YOU DID say that Nintendo should offer better hardware, while competely ignoring the fact that it CANNOT HAPPEN. It simply baffles me that people cry for Nintendo about Switch having obviously weaker hardware than PS4 / Xbone while not even acknowledging the fact that Switch is a portable! It's like crying about Volvo having a prohibitely high price tag! WELL DUH!

And don't even get me started on the notion that if Nintendo were to release powerful hardware, third parties would pay attention. We saw it during the GC days. Moreover, weak hardware is not an excuse to be so absent on (especially a critical commercial success like the Switch) the platform! Even Vita had many third party exclusive attempts, at least until it floundered!

No excuses.

PS: In the end, I simply don't care, especially for EA. The few 3rd parties caring for (Atlus etc) are on Nintendo anyways, and I have learned not to expect for more. PC it is for the rest.

Wii and WiiU were also very low powered so it isn't like this is the first time.

Goodnightmoon said:
V-r0cK said:

BraLoD is correct.  

Who told Nintendo to make a tablet/hybrid to begin with?  I swear people deliberately forget that Nintendo has the decision to make a system equal or greater than their competitors.

This is nothing more than the result of Nintendo's decision, which anybody could've seen a mile away, when making a significally weaker console than the competitors in which developers are more accustomed to.

You guys cannot be more simple sometimes, feels like your argument about everything is always the same, powah. Nintendo not taking the decision of making another generic third party box is what is gonna make Switch a huge success to begging with, so that was undoubtly the right decision. 

The user that complained about a downgraded port wasn't talking about graphics so all this converstaion about "blame them for the weaker hardware" is pretty out of place.

To both... Fifa 14 on consoles launch had a missing feature on PS4 and PS4 were always the main seller of the game... and even with a gimped port it outsold X1 version... so stop with all the excuses for not buying 3rd party content on Nintendo and still demanding more to be released and not sold. Because we all hear how Nintendo is the best that there is and that no 3rd party is competent and how all their games are bad and generic. So why do you want them?



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."