Soundwave said:
Depends sort of IMO. When you have too much competetion it leads to a situation where Sega is gone for example. And that wasn't good for gamers, we lost a really valuable part of gaming when Sega dissolved away. Too many gaming options can be bad because a legitimately good one can end up getting less marketshare than they should. |
And that meant Sega wasn't strong and that was bad for the industry
duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."
