By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
binary solo said:
eva01beserk said:

I liked the order 1886. I wish sony takes another risk with it and makes a sequel or an expansion, Id be happy with that, the game looked great already.

I liked it too, enough that I want SOny to take the risk and make a sequel. But we seem to be too small in number for Sony to be willing to take that risk.

Mar1217 said:

Except the game IS heavely scripted so I guess the way the ''physic engine'' works has probably more to do with the work they put into the animation of every detail on the screen which give the illusion of an advanced physic engine.

Kinda like how Tom Cruise movies give the illusion that he's taller than his female co-stars. It still works, who cares what tricks they use to get there?

I would like The Order 2 as well.

Nogamez said:
Lawlight said:

How do you want a cover shooter to play like?

I don't really care how a cover Shooter plays like because I've been playing cover based shooters since at least 2006 man  so bored of them, just like I'm totally done with FPS, overdone and boring, but I've been gaming since atleast 1995.  

I have been gaming since 88 or so. Played platforms since those times on Pitfall. Guess all platformers play more or so the same and are boring.

Mnementh said:
Well, I'm probably too old. I learned a long time ago, that graphically impressive games aren't the one I remember five years from now, if they aren't bringing something else. I'm sure Horizon delivers on that front, though. But this graphic will look old in some years, The classics are the games that are fun even with graphic that is outdated.

Disagree man... Maybe graphic only won't burn in your memory, but I can tell you that the first thing that burned in my memory in GT1, FF IX and RE were their stunning graphics, but perhaps they only stayed because they were fantastic games... and FF IX I still relook at them from time to time and it is still gorgeous.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."