Chazore said:
We still got ye old "PS has no games" label tossed around last gen and this gen, then we had it applied to Xbox, despite Xbox actually having games like Sony had. People buy them for their name, not what they do these days, I'd hardly call that good for eevryone tbh, yeah they make wads of cash, but so do oil rig companies that cause spills as well, yay for oil, bad for spills. I'm talking for anything in general, just throwing money and always expecting good results. |
There will always be trolls, but the "ps has no games" today is a very small portion of people. So Sony indeed changed it's image on both being broke and not releasing anything.
duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."