Dulfite said:
I believe the eye can't even tell the difference between 60 fps and higher, if I was told correctly. And i'm sure resolutions won't be noticable in difference at some point either. Eventually, the only thing that will continue to matter is if your console play style and games (Nintendo's strong suits) are better than the competitors (Sony and Microsofts weak suit, who focus constantly and almost entirely on fps and resolution). |
Yeah, sure... when Nintendo have a console that is about the same power and pushing 4k60fps Sony and MS will just disappear because no ones care about what they offer.
duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."
