By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Chazore said:
DonFerrari said:

Sony was considered dead after PS3 issues, Apple was irrelevant in early 90's and even 00's... a company may change their image, but it takes a lot of money and will.

Yet they never announced the actual death, not was there any point in time where it had actually died at all. 

Apple chanegd their image into one worse off than their older one.

 

You can toss money into a pit and it could still return you nothing.

I agree they didn't die, but nonetheless that was the image they had and they changed it.

I didn't cared about Apple there and I don't like Apple now, but for the people that buy from them the image changed a lot.

Well, with MS console department I can understand why you think it would be throwing money at a pit.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."