By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
LudicrousSpeed said:
DonFerrari said:

Yes if only games mattered right? And the games showed on PS4 vs X1 reveal had a more proeminent difference than the games on X1X vs PS4Pro.

Games do matter. As well as UI, controller, and network. That's why I own over 100 games on Xbone and maybe 1/5th of that on PS4. That's also why I'd be more excited about an Xbox mid gen refresh than the half assed refresh Sony gave us.

What games were even shown during the PS4 reveal?  Fucking Killzone and Knack? lol. This is hilarious. It's ok, man. The X is not even going to outsell the Xbone S, let alone your PS4. There is no need for such nonsense.

And all the games that looked better on PS4 vs X1, but sure we know that you preffer MS, no need to say it. But sure you are diverging so much from your point on being a monster just to justify your difference in consideration.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."