By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
DarthVolod said:
SuaveSocialist said:

1 If they somehow managed to compete with the efficiency, lethality and ranged effectiveness as murder hoses and rival their consumption of life---why not?

2 too late.

3 Ignore hundreds of indepently verified instances of corruption if you like.  Unfortunately, ignoring corruption doesn't make it go away. Dear Leader's regime is the gold standard for corrupfion.

4 The topic's victim is a noteworthy member of a demonstrably corrupt government--shooting him fits the long-held NRA/Republican talking point about taking arms against a corrupt government.

5 The 2nd A predates them as well, which is why I mentioned it, and I still see no formal time frame for how long it takes corruption to manifest.

6 Such a treatise would infringe on the right to bear arms.  He took arms--"necessary" for the "freedom" of the "State"--as 2nd A guarantees is his right. No other way to put it: the Second Amendment struck again.

1. You can't just ban everything since almost anything can be used as a weapon. 

2. lol got me there I guess.

3. Independently verified sources?

4. Again, do we even know his intent?

5.I think the founders would probably have said it takes more than 6 months

6. You are just assuming the motivation of the man

1. I never said "ban".  You asked of regulations, and I answered of regulations.

3. Yes.

4. We know his actions are consistent with right wing murder hose philosophies.  

5.  I had no idea that the 2nd A waits 183 days before kicking in.  Dear Leader doesn't have much time before even you think he's fair game.

 

6. No, I am not.  I have spoken only of his actions, the Constitution, and Republican/NRA murder hose philosophies.  None mentioned intent, nor did any rely upon it for their respective positions.

The only assumption is that the aforementioned philosophies have internally consistent logic--though I do admit it's a bit of a stretch to give them that much credit.

Bye!