But your 2 phrases contradicts one another, he was either presurring his boss or he was doing what was told.
I don't think you really read what I was saying.
I said he was potentially using the press coverage to put pressure on his boss.
You said you think it would be stupid to publically pressure your boss.
I said, he wasn't doing so publically, but using the media questions themselves to apply pressure.
It doesn't really matter. It's just a guess because I notice things like when people randomly, non-sequitorially mention things that weren't part of the discussion. But there is no contradiction, and it was not to publically put him on the spot. Both the things you said were incorrect.
Like, he's not even saying that Satya supports the library. The way he said it, like it was a future event happening, and that satya would say, "we need to support", as if it's something he hasn't said yet. It really looks like he's putting words in satya's mouth that he thinks satya should say.
That's just my opinion.
