By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Intrinsic said:
DonFerrari said:

Yep, the basics of trade-off.

Uhnnn do you consider me someone? For me there is a big difference from 1080p to 4k even on 55" from 10 ft away... but I actually do 4k on 65" at 5 ft away.

I hear you, but I'm sorry I don't believe you. I don't think you are lying though. So its complicated.

I have seen people get a HD tv, plug in composite cables to it and a DVD player... and god oh my god this is HD.

I also know, that as far as rez goes, it all comes down to the screen door effect. Basically, what happens when you can "see" the lines between pixels. The more pixels you have, or the further away you are, the less likely it will be for you to notice it. And noticing this happens in two ways. If you are close enough to the screen where you actually see the lines, or if you are a little further back from it where you cant see the lines but theimage overall is "softer". I put that in quotes cause that only applies when you have something to compare it to or when you have trained your eyes to look for it.

But at a certain distance, its just impossible to "resolve" that difference. And that is fact.... its why ads in soccer stadiums look so sharp and clear from a distance but near impossible to see upclose.

So big difference? from 10ft away? Nope. I just don't believe you. But I will agree with you though, so this doesn't become some sort of argument. I know beter than to argue with anyone when the discussion is on resolution.

I personally call it them "feeling" the resolution and not seeing it.

You didn't said "big difference" you said "no difference". So yes, I can see the difference in resolution on 55" 10 feet away from native 1080p to native 4k, being small or big is discussible.

But at 5 feet away on 65" I can almost see individual pixels and usually spoil other fun when pointing a tarnish on the screen. And I don't have trained eyes.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."