By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
DonFerrari on 16 June 2017
Edit Thread
Azzanation said:
DonFerrari said:

The sales. Owww sorry, no, some poll on the internet. Sales are irrelevant.

What does sales have to do with who had the better E3? Are you joking? 60m gamers will be preordering PS games annoucned at E3 while only 30m can pre-order Xbox games. (Do you think over 1 E3 conference that console user base disappears?) omg face palm.

If they both had the same console sale figures and user base than sure maybe we can look at sales as to who won at E3.. and even still Sales does not represent quality.

Yet Switch is outdoing X1 on sales (HW and SW position on Amazon).

And having zero real exclusives, and just a small quantity of AAA platform exclusives sure makes one win an E3, making all Sony fans dirt their pants right?



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."