Mystro-Sama said:
Can't a company just for once announce a game and launch it at E3 right on stage. That would so hype. |
Sony did that with PT =p and some other minor games.
jason1637 said:
Did we read the same article? He did answer about first party "Our first party is a critical part of that equation. Yesterday, I know people want to see what we’re investing in new." He's announced games early before in the 2014 E3 which was his first E3 as head of xbox and ever since then he been pretty consistent in only showing and announcing games coming soon for the last few E3s 2015-2017
He didn't pretend that you won't focus on software when focusing on hardware he said this in the article. "Today I wanted to talk about things that if you’re going to buy the console you will be able to play," |
Yes I did.
Their 1st party being important was said multiple times and he never showed the results of it. But when talking about it he talks about exclusive deals.
So he haven't show in the other E3 no game that would launch only 2 years after?
Yes he said, and that is a lie. It isn't like the people that develop hardware is the same as the one developing SW, and we all know that as soon as a HW launches they start to develop the next HW. And also it isn't like they don't have the resources, several people here claim that MS deep pockets would even buy them the victory this gen and that they could have bought all exclusives they wanted.
duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."