By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
SuaveSocialist on 15 June 2017
Edit Thread
DarthVolod said:
SuaveSocialist said:

Sorry, but the NRA isn't a socialist institution, and they are proponents of the Second Amendment being a citizen's Constitutional right (nay, patriotic duty) to overthrow a corrupt government.  

What you have here is a man who recognized a corrupt government and shot an accomplice to that corruption.  He did exactly as Republicans proudly say they'd do.


There's no other way to say it: the Second Amendment strikes again.  Perhaps if West Koreahad sane firearms regulations, there wouldn't be a mass shooting almost every day.  Perhaps mentally disturbed persons such as this man would have been denied possession of his murder hose.  But hey, you can blame it on Socialism if you want.

1. why aren't we calling for knife control?  

2. Why aren't we banning alll cars? Afterall, they could be used to kill people right?

3. Give me a break ... and rebelling against a corrupt government?

4. You are arguing he is rebelling against a government

5. that became so hopelessly corrupt in under 6 months time?

6. Somehow I don't think the authors of the 2nd ammendment believed that people should attempt to murder politicians because they didn't like the results of ONE election cycle. 

1.  Because the consumption of life from murder hoses keep eclipsing that of knives (might have something to do with their efficiency, lethality, and ranged effectiveness), so they hog most of the attention.
2.  Probably because the manufacturing, selling, ownership and operation of cars are subject to extreme regulations.  You're on to something here, though: perhaps murder hoses should be as thoroughly regulated.  I also note that the US Constitution includes no mention of the right to bear cars, yet the Big Bad Guv'ment never tried taking everyone's cars away (cue Twilight Zone theme).  
3.  www.Corrupt.af (scroll down) Dear Leader's regime certainly fits the description of a corrupt government.
4.  No, that is the NRA/Republican position (at least, considering their rhetoric on the subject and the state of corruption in Dear Leader's regime, anyway.  Internal consistency FTW).  
5.  I had no idea that corruption/tyranny requires a certain amount of time to manifest.  The 2nd A., NRA and Republican Party certainly never outlined a formal time frame. 
6.  Did they mention how many election cycles must pass before the 2nd A. is a lawful reason for bearing arms against a corrupt/unlawful/tyrannical government?  Or how much time must pass?  The 2nd A. doesn't mention any sort of time frame.