Teeqoz said:
I am sure you could do better psych-evaluations (clearly the current screening methods doesn't catch all the nut-jobs), but regardless, that doesn't mean the only other option is denying gun ownership to an economic class... |
No screening method will catch all nut jobs in a country with a population of over 300 million, without abridging the right to privacy and confidentiality alone.
Actually existing proposals for gun laws by American legislators disproportanately affect ownership amongst the lower classes, and that is their intention. The problem in the United States is not gun ownership. It is a variety of other things. It is drug criminalization and its effects on racial minorities and low income persons which pushes them into the drug trade and therefore gangs. It is the lack of mental health resources for the people who need them. It is the marginalization of certain groups in society to where they feel like they have nothing to lose. All of these are conductive to the majority of gun deaths which are 1. suicides, then 2. gang warfare, and then 3. accidents. Mass shootings rate at 2% of all gun homicides, which are themselves a small percentage of all deaths in general.
Solving suicide, solving gang warfare, solving accidents, solving mental health access are priorities but proposing silly laws that just make gun ownership impractical/uneconomical for poor people, and merely inconvenient for the upper classes is not a solution. It is just policy based on classism.







