By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Pristine20 said:
yushire said:

Anyway, many people here complains about third parties didnt optimize Wii's hardware compatibility. But what should Wii's graphics standard graphics looks like?

I'll point out first what shouldnt be done on the Wii when graphics are concerned:

No N64 graphics

No PSX/PS1 graphics

No PS2/or even high end PS2 graphics unless its a Xenossaga 3 or God of War 2 graphics quality

What should be done:

Atleast a high end XBOX/GC graphics

If its high budget game it should be in level of SMG

Needs Source engine graphics quality on the system, ITS MUCH NEEDED

Now for examples, if its a small time developers, atleast copy the quality of their game with Medal of Honor Heroes 2 if its a straight 2-d game it must be a Super paper Mario quality, if its cell shaded it must be with boogie quality and if its cartoony it must be Mario kart quality.

We know the Wii dont have a graphical quality of HD consoles but give atleast consideration on the quality of graphics on the Wii


 Wii owners seem to be the first to say that graphics don't matter and also the first to complain that graphics on the wii aren't good enough.  Maybe third parties don't optimize the graphics for their wii games because they think that wii owners don't care for graphics.


See my guide for graphics whoring. You insist that is a literal phrase, when it means "having the greatest processing power for graphics doesn't matter". It does not mean "It doesn't matter if developers make cheap and shoddy graphics." So those developers are just being lazy.



A flashy-first game is awesome when it comes out. A great-first game is awesome forever.

Plus, just for the hell of it: Kelly Brook at the 2008 BAFTAs