By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Cubedramirez on 07 June 2017
Edit Thread
SpokenTruth said:
Cubedramirez said:

I did smile at this.  You cannot make an argument without assuming something of me. Outside of not being a fan of any network news it's not difficult whatsoever to find the agreement and read it yourself. A deal which doesn't address the largest and fastest growing polluters while having us assist in funding their green upgrades while not even imposing reductions from the those reciving funds. And we're supposed to believe this is anything other than a political agreement because it sure isn't one that puts the environment at the forefront. 

Oh and either you're lying to me or yourself regarding the fact that money from the Green Climate fund will not go to China. 

https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2017/06/02/climate/trump-paris-green-climate-fund.html

Somebody lied to you.  Somebody told you the money went to China.  They were using you to spread that information.  That should piss you off.

I love the per person contribution graph and how they are trying to create a meme that the US is not even giving their 'fair share' amount. 

Also your link only shows projects for 2016 that have been approved. Nothing stated there refutes the fact that China is amoung the countries who would recieve funds from the climate fund going forward as their classification.

I shouldn't even have to do this but frankly your hubrisis laughable. Go read the entire article 9 section of the agreement and understand under this agreement China is a developing country. 

I have nothing else to say, this has become boring.