By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
ChaosReich said:
Imaginedvl said:

Ahah..

Maybe because the difference between the Xbox 360 vs PStation Three was not even close to what happened with the PStation Four and the Xbox One... And yes, the PStation Four did not have any exclusive advantages at launch you know, only that price/power difference... Sorry buddy but that's what it is, lower price for more powerfull console, Microsoft screwed up and there is no come back (to at least beat Sony) but the good thing is that the Xbox One is doing very well overall and that's the good part :)

I serioisly was just asking, your usage of "ahah" and "buddy" seemed passive aggressive so i think you misunderstood my tone.....

 Anyways, back to my point, remember that the old Sony systems were weaker then their competion yet massively outsold its competition. Also, both the PS2 and original Xbox sold at $300 with the Xbox being the stronger of the 2 yet it was very much outsold. So im just pointing that out in reference to you claim that it was "only that price/power difference". Plus, like ive mentioned ad infinitum, dont you also think that Microsofts original shitty policies concerning used games and always online may have also played a large part in why the Ps4 took off to a massive head start?

I honestly do not think the original policies hurted them as much as the price/power difference but yes, it played a role for sure, would be hard to disagree with that. As far past generation, again, the disparity at first (including lunching at the same time or almost) did not happen like it happened with the PStation Four and Xbox One. 

For the general consumer (not fans or hardcore gamers), it was as simple as that: Two next gens consoles,  both can play the same games, one is more powerfull and 100$ less expensive... The choice is pretty easy.