spemanig said:
Nautilus said:
No its not.If you buy through VC, you get to keep them for life(or until your console breaks, then you gonna need to buy a new console).
If you only had the option of getting through the subsciption, you would have to pay it every year 20 dollars just to play a very selective game you want.Plus, if someday Nintendo ever decides to end the program for that console(due to the console age and there being a a new console out already), you wouldnt be able to go back and play those games you want.
What you are proposing is that less option is better for the consumer.This way is much better.You get to buy and own the games you want, but at the same time, if you just want constant acess to hundreds of old games(which Im sure this library will get bigger over time, and encompass more consoles over time), you simply subscribe.Its the better choice for Nintendo to make(this way they also make more money out of it, and make consumers happier)
|
If you care about keeping them for life, you have the Wii U, 3DS, and Wii VC with digital versions. If it's between one or the other, a subscription is obviously the superior option.
|
And there is the NES, and SNES if I wanted to get the physical versions.So what?I want convinience.I want to get them on the most recent Nintendo console, which also happens to be portable.And betwenn the two options, VC is clearly superior for people like me.As for reasons why, I already wrote in the previous posts, in which you didnt counter them.Having VC is clearly better for the costumer.Cant believe you think less choice is better.
