| Nem said: I think you misunderstood what i said. There is no norm. There are aproximations of all kinds. If we had to have a norm it would be our general shape. In that regard an homosexual completely fits the norm. It's not an alien you know...
|
You're generalising. I obviously wasn't speaking to a norm of a complete human being, but the norm of sexual behaviour. Let's say that there's 5% (+/- 5%) of the global population that's homosexual (or bisexual or whatever). In this case 90% or more are heterosexual, thus making it the norm, or more accurate, the statistical mode. Meaning, if you pick people out completely randomly, there's obviously a higher chance to pick a heterosexual person.
And that's ignoring the biological narrative. Because a species is driven to evolution by reproduction, homosexuals can't naturally reproduce if they follow their attraction. That would make homosexuality a mutation.
