Euphoria14 said:
Any possible way to prove PS3 is overpriced? Last I checked the lowest model PS3 was $400 and still offered more than the $350 360 that also requires another $50 for online making it not only the same price, but without the BluRay, WiFi, Remote play, Free online, the list goes on. In actuality, whether you believe it or not, 360 is more overpriced than the PS3. Mention the arcade and it gets even worse considering a 20GB 360 HDD is what? $100? Still making it inferior to the PS3 in terms of what it offers. The price argument has been invalid for a long time bro. Then what happens if the 40GB does indeed get BC? Don't say it won't either. PS2 after enough time ran PS1 games on software only. As it does with the PS3 now.
Want to know what overpriced is? Wii is sold for profit, 360 is sold for profit. PS3 is sold at a loss, meaning it is not possible to say it is overpriced. |
Blu Ray = Non issue. Seriously if I don't care and I sit 4-6 feet away from a 53" Sony 1080p LCD, and im a bit of a graphics whore.... Why should he?
You can go on and on about free online but its a lonely experience online if his friends are on Live now isnt it?
Games will be cheaper for him if he can borrow some of his friends back catalogue, so he can play a lot of games for essentially free and the biggest cost of a system is actually the games you buy for it.
It doesn't matter if the list price for the PS3 is lower after you add in all the "extra value features" But isn't the point of a gaming machine - playing games and having fun. Since he likes the 360 controller more and has friends with Xbox360s - You have friends you play with online I hope? The value of the machine would be far greater than the PS3. I personally would hate to be the one with the odd machine out.
Value =/= price divided by features.
Tease.