Kaneman! said:
I had a similar train of thought to that, especially regarding adoption rights. I don't take sides, our country already denied that right in a referendum, but I do like a discussion. Especially when one of the most common arguments is that being gay is natural. But is it also natural for two male humans to produce a child? No, it's not. Always get attacked when I point it out. Am I a homophobe for that? |
Honestly, i disagree with the both of you.
Firstly, homosexuals make as much sense as all of us existing. It's nature. In the end we all die, the sun explodes, all life dies. The universe is chaotic and humanity is a blip. It doesn't have to make sense outside the context, wich is this planet and evolution of said life. Homosexuality is just like any other genetic condition. It is the product of imperfection, but none of us is the perfect human beeing. As great as DNA is for evolution, it hardly ever gets it right, and homosexuality is not the worst you can have.
Now, the second point, i think is utter foolishness. I don't think a homosexual is any less capable of raising a child than anyone else. There are terrible people out there, wich are infinitly worse human beeings who mistreat children. Also, these are genetic conditions. Parent's don't pass their straight to all their children from raising them, or there wouldn't be any homosexuals. The same is true for the opposite situatiob. The "gay" isn't infecting.
What a child needs is a caring home. Any issue that could arise would arise from external sources (aka discrimination). Caving to them is reinforcing them. So, i am definitly against that reinforcement.
