bigjon said:
GProgrammer said:
There were 3 terrorists armed with knives (and a van) which caused 6 deaths now you want them armed with guns instead, Ka-Pi96 why do you want 60 londoners killed instead of 6, because more deaths would of happened if they had access to guns
Hypothetical situation
Ka-pi96 sitting in pub supping an ale "treken rulz"
gunman bursts in spraying bullets
Ka-pi96 "thank god Im packing a weapon" (reaches down)
Ka-pi96's head explodes in a mist of red blood
terrorist "thank allah they now allow people to buy guns in this country I can easily kill much more infidals quickly"
Ka-pi96's ghost 'well it seemed a good idea at the time'
|
http://www.cnn.com/2015/05/04/us/garland-mohammed-drawing-contest-shooting/
this is what happens in the USA if they try that shit in a "non gun free zone"
|
The best qoute of the article..."Authorities are still trying to determine the suspects' motives, U.S. Secretary of Homeland Security Jeh Johnson said Monday."
Yea, I bet that's real hard to figure out when you're working under Obama. We know exactly what their motives were.