etking said:
AAA300 said:
So you don't think spending trillions to lower it by 0.2 is good? Strange....
|
Paris is a bad and stupid deal because there are no immediately effective restrictions for China and India which means that trillions are spent to move millions of western high environmental standard mining related jobs there without reducing anything. And it would create a mining based monopoly in their favor.
If we really want to try to change our climate, and the UN climate group says that a serious prediction of climate change is impossible due to it's complexity, we would need much more drastic measures involving India and China which are by far the top polluters. Drastic measures like abandoning all fossil-fuel-driven cars and planes which does not seem possible or practical and the results are still unknown. And the next ice age is coming anyway or we end up like mars. The future of the climate most likely out of our control.
|
Oh I know, I was agreeing with you.