By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
spemanig said:
Captain_Yuri said:
I wonder which games won't be requiring the online fee to play them online since it says "most games will require a paid online service subscription from Nintendo in order to play online."

Animal Crossing?

I don't think Nintendo has done a good job at all at making this service seem like it's even worth $1. Hopefully this "trial" rectifies that, though I wonder what features will be missing until the pay-time comes.

Also, I hate when Nintendo just gives a general year. Everyone is expecting Q1 when it will probably be delayed until Q4, and that's not a good thing when this whole mess comes off so bare bones as it is.

EDIT: Also, didn't we know it would be $20 for months? That's what the japanese price revealed/leaked months back implied.

You mean you don't crave paying 20 bucks to play Splatoon in it's intended state?  The sound of playing games that are literally-no hyperbole-not even exaggerating- 30 years old doesn't incite you?  Some people man I swear.

As for that smartphone app... I get it.  They want to have a way to do portable voice chat - maybe they're expecting people to tether their Switch and the voice app to their smartphone's data plan to play "wherever".  It's a neat idea but if those Hori images tell the tale, it's just as awful as this Nintendo Online service.



"You should be banned. Youre clearly flaming the president and even his brother who you know nothing about. Dont be such a partisan hack"