Art is completely subjective and for him to say Nintendo doesn't support video games as a medium of art is as narrow minded as it can get. It would seem to me that his 'definition' of art refers to the 'definition' of the screen resolution. This also means his minds is in a constant flux over what makes a video game a piece of art. The mediums change, the tools change but the subjectiveness of art never changes. When each art movement back int eh day changed, such the changes to cubism, realism, abstract, etc....were the artist that continued to pain in the old style not considered artists anymore simply because they weren't with the times? Again, I find this nothing more than an attention whore trying to make some noise. Get his name in the papers.
Existing User Log In
New User Registration
Register for a free account to gain full access to the VGChartz Network and join our thriving community.
