By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Bermuda said:
Ganoncrotch said:

Honestly it's thinking like this which creates bigger issues though, even if the person is a "muslim" he would still be an extremeist not the same at all as the 99.999999999% of people who practice the faith.

And saying you know who is responsible without knowing is a terrible way to think of the world, you should always know before you start to call out or retaliate.

Because I do know who is responsible​, just like everyone else. There's just the few SJWs who play the waiting game but....we all know, how could we not. I've seen this same thing before.

 

There's a terrorist incident and nobody knows whose done it, people obviously assume it's a Muslim, the odd naive guy says "We should wait to see first because that's just racist etc", then to nobodies at all it a Muslim, rinse and repeat with no difference.

 

It doesn't matter if he's an Extremist, he's still a Muslim. When was the last time a Extremist Buddhist or Sikh killed a bunch of people in a terrorist incident? It doesn't happen.

But it does. In india you will hear all the religions complaing about other religions doing terrorist acts.  Burma buddhist aren't that nice to muslims either but most buddhist say the ones in burma are extremist.  

It is also not about defending or being a SJW but we are talking about Manchester that has a muslim population and probably muslims are also a part of the victims/police officers helping concert goers/Paramedics trying to save lives right now etc..   That's like Norwegians blaming Christians for Breivik's slaughter :s.