By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Garcian Smith on 07 June 2008
Edit Thread
TheRealMafoo said:
Garcian Smith said:

Except the anomalies aren't "minor." In fact, they're enough that the PS3 version was given an 8-9% lower composite score on Gamerankings than its 360 brother.


And if you used the same measuring stick, (load times, frame rates, visual quality), the 360 version would be equally lower then the PC version.

people don't rate games with PC vs 360 in mind however.


Um, no. The 360 version has no frame rate issues, and most PC players won't be running at higher than 1920x1080 anyway unless they have a top-of-the-line machine and a top-of-the-line monitor. As for the load times, I can't really compare them, but the 360 ones aren't agonizingly slow like they are on the PS3.



"'Casual games' are something the 'Game Industry' invented to explain away the Wii success instead of actually listening or looking at what Nintendo did. There is no 'casual strategy' from Nintendo. 'Accessible strategy', yes, but ‘casual gamers’ is just the 'Game Industry''s polite way of saying what they feel: 'retarded gamers'."

 -Sean Malstrom