By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
pokoko said:
KLAMarine said:

We are having a conversation. During this conversation, I asked you a question regarding a reference you made to illegal tactics Nintendo employed which hurt Sega. At this point, I'm wondering what these once-illegal-now-not-assuredly-illegal tactics were and how they hurt Sega.

Help me out here.

I don't get what you're trying to say.  If you don't believe Nintendo's 2-year exclusive contracts and history of cut-throat business practices contributed to their monopoly then just say so.  We can just disagree, it's as simple as that.

I don't deny that 2-year exclusive contracts and cut-throat business practices can contribute towards a monopoly. It's just this article, http://articles.latimes.com/1991-04-11/business/fi-359_1_nintendo-game , unless I've misread it, seems to make no mention of such practices. Seems to only discuss price fixing.