pokoko said:
I don't get what you're trying to say. If you don't believe Nintendo's 2-year exclusive contracts and history of cut-throat business practices contributed to their monopoly then just say so. We can just disagree, it's as simple as that. |
I don't deny that 2-year exclusive contracts and cut-throat business practices can contribute towards a monopoly. It's just this article, http://articles.latimes.com/1991-04-11/business/fi-359_1_nintendo-game , unless I've misread it, seems to make no mention of such practices. Seems to only discuss price fixing.







