KLAMarine said:
We are having a conversation. During this conversation, I asked you a question regarding a reference you made to illegal tactics Nintendo employed which hurt Sega. At this point, I'm wondering what these once-illegal-now-not-assuredly-illegal tactics were and how they hurt Sega. Help me out here. |
I don't get what you're trying to say. If you don't believe Nintendo's 2-year exclusive contracts and history of cut-throat business practices contributed to their monopoly then just say so. We can just disagree, it's as simple as that.
