KLAMarine said:
Ali_16x said:
Jesus Christ that post about Nintendo fans is so true.
|
Must we resort to this?
pokoko said:
I shouldn't have said illegal because, as far as I've read, the charge that Nintendo's exclusive contracts were an anti-trust violation was never settled. Still, they dropped those, probably to avoid future litigation, though that's a guess. Or maybe they had an inkling that third-parties would leave them because of those contracts. I believe EA said they were fully prepared to go PC-only rather than work under those conditions. Or maybe they thought they had won the war and didn't need them. Square said Nintendo let Final Fantasy go without a fight so maybe they felt untouchable.
Either way, it's kind of interesting. Personally, I agree with the charge that they used those 2-year exclusive contracts to keep their monopoly. It all became moot, anyway, though I can't help but wonder if the methods they used to gain power caused that power to decay faster than it should have.
|
Right. Still, you made reference to illegal tactics that hurt Sega.
pokoko said:
Sega, a company that was hurt very badly by Nintendo's illegal tactics in the US
|
What tactics were you referring to?
|
Uh ... huh? I thought we were having a conversation but ... huh? I guess we haven't actually been communicating? Odd. Unless you're trying to do some 'console warz' thing, in which case you completely fooled me. Congrats, I guess. How disappointing.