By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Bristow9091 said:

I mean, I'm not going to complain about the graphics and such since it's in beta and still being worked on, and we've not even got a solid release date yet... wouldn't be surprised if it slipped into next year.

That said, it looks nice in its own way... although still feels empty to look at and the cars stand out as being much higher quality than the rest of the game, but regardless, it's decent for what it is, I think Gran Turismo has been slipping away from "graphics king" when it comes to racing games for a long time now anyway, I still think Driveclub looks better than what we've seen in this video, mainly because of the amount of detail and such put into the environment, it feels more alive if that makes sense.

However, I'll still be buying the game, since I'm a fan of the franchise... despite not playing Gran Turismo 6 lol (It didn't look like it added much onto Gran Turismo 5 so I didn't bother with it)

PD doesn't use a bunch of post processing effects to 'hide the flaws' and make it look better than it is. It looks very clean and sharp which has always been the focus of GT's graphics. DriveClub throws a lot of effects (bloom, lens flare, heavy motion blur, camera shake) on top to give the illusion of higher detail.


Ofcourse GT Sport also runs at double the framerate with 18 more detailed cars on track. (instead of 12) Which does give me high hopes for the VR version. Since it already runs at 60fps, GT Sport won't need to cut as drastically into the graphics as DriveClub VR had to. Plus GT Sport was designed with VR in mind and should have pro support for VR as well.