By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
glimmer_of_hope said:
AlfredoTurkey said:

No, I'm sorry, it's not lol. A website is like a home. As the owner, if you don't want someone in your house, you have the right to kick them out. The same rules apply to an owner of a website like the one you and I are conversing on right now. If the owner of Vgchartz doesn't like what we say, for any reason or no reason at all, they can ban us and there is no law broken. You may think that's wrong, and that's your right, but it's true. 

If you want total free reign over what you say, you have to create your own website. 

So who controls content? For the record Leslie Jones has said MANY racist things on her account. What about ISIS accounts? But Milo gets shut down for being a troll? Go look at the content on Twitter and tell me theres no bias or agenda there! It's a joke. 

There is 100% a bias.  However, there is no law against that.  Twitter is privately owned, so they can choose to not allow someone on their site.  It is hypocritical for those on the left to call Milo a hater and he deserved to be banned,  but give others a pass.  But, again, there is no law against hypocrisy.  The only thing that would change anything is if enough people on the right, as well as those in the middle who don't like the hypocrisy, banded together and boycotted Twitter (or whatever company displayed a strong bias.)  That's not likely to happen, though, as most people will just complain about Twitter on Twitter.