SuaveSocialist said:
Ouroboros24 said:
Let's get this straight.
So Sticky asks: "For commiting what...exactly?"
You answer with: "For three hundred (and counting!) separate acts of corruption within his regime.
https://corrupt.af Click link, scroll down, click any given article for full details.
Among them, you find there are lots of reasons to remove Beloved Leader from office...not that the West Korean government has the integrity to do so."
The "For three hundred (and counting!) separate acts of corruption within his regime." is a direct answer for the "For committing what...exactly?" question that was asked. Which, is a form of asking: what grounds for impeachment. Then you go and insert link. Then I go, "smoke without fire." Yeah, there is a difference between "reasons for impeachment, and list of impeachment crimes. Sorry for thinking you'd understand what I meant. But when you go and answer a question that says, "For commiting what...exactly," that directly asks the op about impeachment grounds that Donald's committed, it would direct most into thinking you were giving out reasons for impeachment.
In that case, sorry for the misunderstanding.
|
Bolded, because you've missed it--or ignored it--several times already.
Among them, you find there are lots of reasons to remove Beloved Leader from office
|
Definition of impeach
-
-
1a : to bring an accusation againstb : to charge with a crime or misdemeanor; specifically : to charge (a public official) before a competent tribunal with misconduct in officec : to remove from office especially for misconduct
-
2 : to cast doubt on; especially : to challenge the credibility or validity of impeach the testimony of a witness
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/impeach
Close enough, don't you think?
