Lawlight said:
Shiken said:
Switch will get far more attention from Nintendo profits than cheap mobile games, that was a laughbly weak jab. As far as theme parks, it is highly likely that the returns will be worth the investment (which means more money for games and other expansions).
Also the theme parks are likely to ve Nintendo themed, making them unique. This will further advertise their games which will lead to more game sales, which translates to more profits. It is a win/win investment.
Sony on the otherhand has been bleeding money in other divisions for years. While Nintendo has lost far less than Sony in recent years due to the fact that other Sony divisions negate any profit the gaming division sees. It is only recently that Sony started getting better as a company, and they still have a long eay to go.
All in all though, I am glad both are doing well. My PS4/WiiU (and now Switch) combo has always been the best in my eyes for console gaming. My X1 on the otherhand...that thing sees nothing but dust.
|
I don't think the Switch got more attention than Pokemon Go.
So, you're assuming that Nintendo's non-gaming income will be used to invest in games but Sony's gaming income will be used to invest in non-gaming divisions?
Sony has, for many years now, had many profitable divisions. Please stick to facts. Example, in FY2105 and FY2014 Sony had 7 profitable divisions.
|
I am sticking to the facts when I say that Sony for many years has been losing money as a company. That said, all profitable divisions are overshadowed by loses durong that time. Gaming included
