SpokenTruth said:
This is the problem with Trump and his supporters. You didn't elect a king but a president. With that comes checks and balances. Calling a federal judge random and the state of Hawaii random dismisses the very fundamental fabric this country is built upon. |
To me the President of the United States holds more water than one single judge in the country. So as for a major country/world wide issue such as the travel ban on the heavy terrorist states, to me it shoudl be the Supreme Court and only teh Supreme court that should be approving/holding up/blocking such an order.
When Obama was president, I'm sure there was some random judge in like Kentucky or something that was rulling that every single thing that Obama did was unconstitutional.
We are too highly partisaned these days for every judge in the united states to be considered a check and balance. THere are over 3000 federal judges in teh u.s. right now, and your saying its a good thing to have it that all it takes is one of them to block any and everything the president, or congress does?
We are a democratic republic right? So why not get teh opinion on all 3000+ judges. Wouldn't that make more sense. Cause of right now, just 1 out of 3000 judges is holding something up. That seems skewed.
