By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Kaneman! said:
Goatseye said:

Does it eally dimishes the recognition of other WWII stories to make a game about 82nd Airborne feats?

Oh, I don't mind if a specific story is portrayed. I don't even mind how they're gonna portray the scenario that they'll portray in the game.

My point is that looking from your standpoint, NOT portraying something isn't directly diminishing their part in the war if it was minuscule in comparison to the big picture. I'm not saying it shouldn't be portrayed, I'm saying that it not being portrayed doesn't necessary mean discrimination.

Personally, I'd be happy with multiple war theatres, being able to play both sides. Include the Winter War, Japan's invasion of China, partisans in Yugoslavia, etc.

I don't think a game focusing only on the specific minor groups would be bad either. A focused shooter based on a certain division/group would be very interesting as well.

I didn't argue that. 

People called into question wether women/minorities (specifically African Americans in this case) participated in the front lines. And all this convo is about people getting upset, because Sledgehammer is pandering to "SJW" and the likes.