Pemalite said:
How is that even a comparison? He isn't stealing. Console manufacturer/developer/publisher looses nothing.
That is not required either.
It's already been tested in court. Emulators won.
Not true.
Not an accurate comparison. |
https://gaming.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/795/what-exactly-does-the-law-state-about-emulation-and-roms
I'd like to add that the ONLY time that you can legally have a ROM is if it was 1) purposefully released into the public domain by the copyright owner, 2) was given or sold to you by the copyright owner, 3) has had its copyright expire (75 years after publication, i.e. no video games until well into this century), or 4) it is an archival copy that YOU created for backup purposes (it cannot be a downloaded copy)
Emulators (without copyrighted material) are perfectly legal. However bypassing copy protection to dump the ROMS or BIOS is in a legal grey area. Downloading is definitely out.
PSCX2 is about as legal as you can get as it reads directly of ps2 discs. However dumping the ps2 Bios to do so is still dodgy, not perfectly legal.
Morally it's not stealing, it's more akin to printing your own money. Nobody loses anything right? It's simply an activity that is tolerated as long as it stays small. It's not really worth going after until it becomes too popular. And then it might be too late as with the music industry and freemium games will be the future instead.
Here's a more recent article on emulators
http://www.techradar.com/news/gaming/are-game-emulators-legal-1329264
Anyway I don't buy this whole preservation argument. You should preserve the hardware as well, not just a copy. It's like, I'm preserving history by keeping a picture of the mona lisa! Poor excuse.







