| VGPolyglot said: So, we can't talk about nukes when referring to World War III? No, I don't think that there'll be a WWIII, unless it's between bourgeoisie and proletariat. |
I checked the date this morning and I'm pretty sure it said 2017 and not 1917.
As for the real topic, who knows what North Korea will do. They are no real threat to the U.S. of course, but they could do an awful lot of damage to South Korea and Japan. Not WW3 exactly but great potential for loss of life (mostly due to some kind of biological weapon attack rather than nuclear I would imagine). No one could tell you if they will actually do it though.
Who would really be the major players in WW3 anyways? Media can't seem to decide if Russia is America's sworn enemy (again), or if Putin and Trump are BFFs. China doesn't exactly care about North Korea either aside from liking the fact that NK could cause some havoc for SK or Japan and by extension the U.S.
