By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Salnax said:
palou said:

Should they however be aloud to spread the belief? That is how I would define not "tolerating" a belief. It does not mean to attack people, simply an attempt to kill off the belief itself, in the long run.

I think that a bad and/or stupid belief will ultimately die out provided that superior ideas can also be permitted, and thus compete with them. If anything, openly showing a bad idea makes it subject to more scrutiny and criticism. Besides, controlling speech without interfering with personal liberties seems like a difficult task at best.

I recognize that my opinion sounds a bit overly optimistic, but I truly believe that if one belief is better than another, it can come out ahead by default.

I could name a few examples in history where that was not the case, with devasting consequences.



Bet with PeH: 

I win if Arms sells over 700 000 units worldwide by the end of 2017.

Bet with WagnerPaiva:

 

I win if Emmanuel Macron wins the french presidential election May 7th 2017.