Should all beliefs be tolerated?

[palou]

ArnoldRimmer said:

palou said:

What I propose is a disctinction of beliefs that cannot be tolerated

1. One must not sell superiority, through faith or any arbitrary quality among believers (see: caste system.). It must not give the right to judge others because of their beliefs, or instigate excessive fear of the lack of belief, attacking the irrational.

2. One must not oppose the fundamental rights of any human, can not take away their right to free speech, and more importantly, free thought.

3. One must not promise you rights which are not yours according to law.

4. One must be open to debate, questioning. It cannot sell itself as infallible, and must allow, or even encourage the exploration of other ideas, particularly amongst youths. 

If a philosophy/religion/sytem of beliefs fails to fulfill any of the above, I believe it must be adjusted accordingly, and only then tolerated by society.

This would all be to reduce adversity and prevent infectious thoughts that attack our irrationality.

So, what do you think?

I think that this seems like a kind of "manifest of intolerance", written by someone who probably believes himself to be very tolerant.

The original manifest of tolerance (a letter concerning tolerance by John Locke) put the limit of the concept of tolerance to ideas that do not disrupt society. I attempted to make a list of general properties that a belief must fullfill to comply to that condition.