yvanjean said:
You are way off based.... If go down this path that mean there is room for everything you believe to be ban and not tolerated. In a world where the vast majority practice one religion they would ban and abolish any other beliefs. Where do you draw the lines and who is making this call? To ban beliefs and try to control it, is a infrigment of our freedom and rights. The world is at war against extremist not because of what they belief but rather because of their destructive behavihors and promotion of violence. I think that violence, sexism, discrimination, destructive behavihors and lack of tolerance should not be tolerated. |
I thought that the outline that I tried to establish was fairly evident; any belief can either follow the rules or not, I don't see the ambiguity.
It also seems fairly impartial, in that the rules established simply outline the properties a belief needs to have to avoid harm to society without analyzing the validity of the belief.
Bet with PeH:
I win if Arms sells over 700 000 units worldwide by the end of 2017.
Bet with WagnerPaiva:
I win if Emmanuel Macron wins the french presidential election May 7th 2017.







