Sony going third party is an excellent idea for gamers.

[FloatingWaffles]

pokoko said:

FloatingWaffles said:

So for the same reasons that, according to you, Nintendo should go 3rd party for all of a sudden aren't appliable to Sony even though it's the exact same thing?

I'm sure there's no bias here at all. 

It's not the same thing.  None of the three companies in question are in the same position or have the same business philosophy.  Each one would have to be analyzed and debated separately.  It certainly is not a "one sized fits all" discussion.

I know this is another VGC retaliation thread meant to make some kind of point but it really doesn't work very well with a direct translation.  Sony, Nintendo, and Microsoft are different beasts.

I'm talking about the points being made for both are the same exact thing, such as "people won't have to buy inferior hardware, games can reach wider audiences, etc". Both apply to Sony, Nintendo, Microsoft, etc if someone wanted to make an argument for putting games on PC or going 3rd party but according to BroLad in his thread it works for Nintendo but all of a sudden not for Sony.