By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Dreamcaster said:
crissindahouse said:

Why should any science need to prove there is no god? If I say that I know an alien from Mars then it's my job to prove it and not the job of others to disprove it. 

That doesn't mean there is no god but it's still not the job of disbelievers to prove there is none. 

Suprisingly, I couldn't agree with you more. Which is why I propose to you that because everything which we can conceive of has a cause, it is logical to suggest that all things, therefore, have a cause. If this is true, then in order to explain the very existence of time and space itself, we have to recognise a 'first cause', which can cause other things (The BIg Bang) and yet, needs no causing itself. The only thing which could fit such a criterion, would be an omnipotent being. This being, due to it being ominpotent, must be God.

But you're describing something different from most believers of God. Most people in a personal God, that has emotions and feelings, and out of all the galaxies and planets and species chooses homo sapiens from Earth to be his favourite. It's not just the belief in some unaware force that most people support.