By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Ruler said:
KLAMarine said:

Let's make an exception for ISIS, shall we? Their Paris attack alone killed 130 and injured 368. I must remind you in case you have forgotten that ISIS targeted Paris knowing full well it was a civilian target. My university mourned the death of one of its alumni after the attack as a matter of fact.

This GBU-43 killed 30-something ISIS fighters as far as is currently known and was dropped on a tunnel complex used by ISIS.

The GBU-43 is neither a chemical nor nuclear weapon.

Bravo on sticking up for ISIS by the way. I'm honestly impressed.

North Korea's pretty bad too.

Its not about killing ISIS member its about using a weapon that can be classified as a weapon of mass destruction, just some days after bombing the Syrian army for accusing them of using weapons of mass destruction. Its pretty irational and unecaptable just like people accuse North Korea to be, but we are talking about the US here.

Nothing irrational about it. GBU-43 is not a chemical weapon.

Ruler said:

There was no need to use this weapon in order to 90 ISIS members, the US has plenty of other weapons.

There was a need: ISIS members were taking shelter underneath considerable fortifications.