By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Leadified said:
Ruler said:

There was no proof of chemical weapons being used by Assad. If the US wouldnt have invaded Iraq and wouldnt have sanctioned Syria and sponsored these protests in the first place, all of this wouldnt have happened. Russia did good things for the world vetoing everything the US wanted, just look what happened in Lybia its even worse now without Gadafi. Lybia used to be one of the richest countries in Africa and now its balkanized and completley in ruins, ISIS is also spreading there rapidley.

Its funny how North Korea tested Nukes for quite some time now but no one losed as much sleep at night as now, so yeah the Russian politician is absolutley right.

Assad agreed to hand over his chemical weapons for destruction after the chemical attack in Ghouta in 2013, do you think he would if he didn't have any? Or that there is no possibility that he used them? I'm not sure why you list examples of American intervention and assume Russia is any better. If Russia did not invade Manchuria, there would be no North Korea. If Russia did not invade Afghanistan, there would be no mujahideen. Putin has dragged Russia right into the middle of the Sunni-Shia conflict now too. Don't be fooled by the crocodile tears from these politicians.

I'm not sure what's you're talking about now, North Korea developing nukes has always been a big deal. Instead of developing into a modern state such as China or Vietnam, North Korea is busy sucking its population dry and using international aid to fund its imperial family.  I don't know how anyone can defend it.

Quite the opposite actually. The mujahideen appeared as a response to the introduction of progressive policies by the government. Then the government requested military support from the USSR.