VGPolyglot said:
Leadified said:
Assad agreed to hand over his chemical weapons for destruction after the chemical attack in Ghouta in 2013, do you think he would if he didn't have any? Or that there is no possibility that he used them? I'm not sure why you list examples of American intervention and assume Russia is any better. If Russia did not invade Manchuria, there would be no North Korea. If Russia did not invade Afghanistan, there would be no mujahideen. Putin has dragged Russia right into the middle of the Sunni-Shia conflict now too. Don't be fooled by the crocodile tears from these politicians.
I'm not sure what's you're talking about now, North Korea developing nukes has always been a big deal. Instead of developing into a modern state such as China or Vietnam, North Korea is busy sucking its population dry and using international aid to fund its imperial family. I don't know how anyone can defend it.
|
That's a simplification of what happened during WWII. The USA and USSR both made an agreement that the Soviet Union would enter the war against Japan 3 months after the war in Europe, and that they'd divide the country along the 38th parallel. It was not a unilateral decision by the USSR.
|
Yes I'm aware. However, it was the Soviets who gave permission to Kim to invade the south and provided weapons and armour to assist in the invasion. The Soviets continued to prop up the Kim family after the war which now takes up to today.
