America is a bigger threat to world peace than North Korea

[Eagle367]

Mar1217 said:
Of course they are, but I don't understand why people finally wake up to this revelation only now ...

 

KLAMarine said:

Ruler said:

That doesnt give the US the right to use the GBU-43, a weapon of mass destruction against anyone.

Let's make an exception for ISIS, shall we? Their Paris attack alone killed 130 and injured 368. I must remind you in case you have forgotten that ISIS targeted Paris knowing full well it was a civilian target. My university mourned the death of one of its alumni after the attack as a matter of fact.

This GBU-43 killed 30-something ISIS fighters as far as is currently known and was dropped on a tunnel complex used by ISIS.

Ruler said:

When just some days ago the US accused Assad of using some of his allgeged chemical weapons of mass destruction, and is now accusing North Korea of wanting to test weapons of mass destruction. Thats pretty hypocritical if you ask me.

The GBU-43 is neither a chemical nor nuclear weapon.

Bravo on sticking up for ISIS by the way. I'm honestly impressed.

North Korea's pretty bad too.

The USA kills hundreds of innocents through drone strikes just in Pakistan, which is not a war zone by the way and technically the USA is breaking international law but who cares about technicalities when you've got the worlds largest army. The country also kills thousands of innocents per month just in Syria so bravo for sticking up for the USA whose slogan is "we do it because screw you"

sc94597 said:
I hope then we can all agree that the U.S should close its military bases, and the American taxpayer can get some nice savings on our tax bills.

Japan and South Korea can defend themselves against North Korea.

Europe can defend itself against Russia.

Israel can work to make peace with their neighbors rather than having bull dog U.S on a leash.

We can maybe keep a large Navy so that nobody messes with our trade routes, but otherwise let everyone else fend for themselves.

And we Americans can be non-interventionist again.

I am not being sarcastic, by the way. I seriously think that the U.S should not be subsidizing the national defense of other countries. They should foot their own bills.

Yes and it should also pull away from the middle east and for heavens sake stop those drones of yours that kills hundreds of innocents and break international laws by crossing borders. And stay away from Africa as well. Let Assad deal with Daesh since you are doing a lousy job at it anyway and decrease your military budget since most of that money goes to private corporations that make war not the soldiers or veterans since many of them are homeless, sometimes limbless and with severe mental diseases. O can't think of any other country that allocates so much if its budget to military but treats soldiers and officers like dirt

sc94597 said:
I hope then we can all agree that the U.S should close its military bases, and the American taxpayer can get some nice savings on our tax bills.

Japan and South Korea can defend themselves against North Korea.

Europe can defend itself against Russia.

Israel can work to make peace with their neighbors rather than having bull dog U.S on a leash.

We can maybe keep a large Navy so that nobody messes with our trade routes, but otherwise let everyone else fend for themselves.

And we Americans can be non-interventionist again.

I am not being sarcastic, by the way. I seriously think that the U.S should not be subsidizing the national defense of other countries. They should foot their own bills.